Community Assessment And Analysis Presentation

Want create site? With you can do it easy.

Community Assessment And Analysis Presentation

As of 2019, Pinehurst had an estimated median household income of $52,366. This is an increase from 2000, when the median household income was $42,946 (City-Data.com, 2020).

However, Pinehurst household income is lower than the Texas median income at $64,034. The estimated per capita income in 2019 was $23,114.

As of March 2019, the cost of living index in Pinehurst was 92.8, less than the US average of 100. The percentage of residents living in poverty in 2019 was 26.7%. The unemployment in November 2020 was 8.3%, slightly above the Texas rate at 8.0%.

Education: For persons above 25 years in Pinehurst: 80.3% have a high school diploma or higher; 20.3% have a Bachelor’s degree or higher; 4.1% have a Graduate or professional degree (City-Data.com, 2020).

Inequality in education is at 12.1%, which is below the Texas average at 13.8%.

Question Part 1: CLC – Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation

Max Points: 200

Details:

This is a Collaborative Learning Community assignment.

This assignment consists of both an interview and a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation.

Assessment/Interview

Select a community of interest. It is important that the community selected be one in which a CLC group member currently resides. Students residing in the chosen community should be assigned to perform the physical assessment of the community.

1. Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.”

2. Interview a community health and public health provider regarding that person’s role and experiences within the community.

Interview Guidelines

Interviews can take place in-person, by phone, or by Skype.

Develop one set of interview questions to gather information about the role of the provider in the community and the health issues faced by the chosen community.

Compile key findings from the interview, including the interview questions used, and submit with the group presentation.

PowerPoint Presentation

Within your group, create a PowerPoint presentation of 15-20 slides (slide count does not include title and reference slide) describing the chosen community interest.

Include the following in your presentation:

1. Description of community and community boundaries: the people and the geographic, geopolitical, financial, educational level, ethnic, and phenomenological features of the community as well as types of social interactions, common goals and interests, barriers, and challenges, including any identified social determinates of health.

2. Summary of community assessment: (a) funding sources and (b) partnerships.

3. Summary of interview with community health/public health provider.

4. Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion. The issue identified can be used for the Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal assignment.

5. A conclusion summarizing your key findings and a discussion of your impressions of the general health of the community.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric given below prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

When submitting this assignment, include the interview questions, the interview findings, completed “Provider Interview Acknowledgement Form,” and the community assessment PPT presentation.

Rubric

CLC – Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
90.0 %Content
20.0 %Description of Community and Community Boundaries: (People, Geographic, Geopolitical , Financial, Educational Level, Ethnic, Phenomenological Features and Types of Interactions, Goals, Interests, Barriers, and Challenges, Including Social Determinates of Health) Description of boundaries of community is omitted. Description of community and boundaries is unclear or incomplete; missing one or more necessary components to give context to the community assessment. Description of community and boundaries of community is complete; a brief description of all components is offered. Description of community and boundaries of community is complete and components of community functioning are discussed in sufficient depth. Description of community is complete. Boundaries are described in great detail, distinguishing environmental boundaries, environmental relationships, and external systems that comprise the open, community system.
20.0 %Summary of Community Health Assessment Community assessment is omitted. Community assessment is provided but discussion is vague or incomplete. Community assessment is complete, and a synopsis of each Functional Health Pattern (FHP) is included. Nursing process and Functional Health Patterns (FHP) are identified with clear indications for actual, at-risk and potential for improved health. Discussion of Functional Health Patterns is clear, complete, and comprehensive, with indications for actual, at-risk and potential diagnoses as well as recommendations for surveillance and preventive measures.
10.0 %Identification an Issue That Is Lacking or an Opportunity for Health Promotion Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is omitted. Community assessment is provided but discussion is vague or incomplete. NA NA Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is effectively included.
15.0 %Conclusion With Summary of Findings and Impressions of General Community Health Conclusion is omitted. Conclusion is incomplete or unclear. Conclusion is complete, with general summary of findings. Conclusion is clear, with a comprehensive discussion of findings and general health of the community. Conclusion is comprehensive, with a detailed summary of key findings that explains general health of the community and offers rationale for recommendations.
15.0 %Summary of Interview With Community Health/Public Health Provider Summary table is omitted. Summary table is incomplete or unclear. Summary table includes all Functional Health Patterns with adequate documentation. Summary table is clear, with a detailed and comprehensive description of findings from an assessment of the chosen community. Summary table is comprehensive, with a detailed description of findings, as well as actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses and recommendations for surveillance and preventative measures.
10.0 %Participation Participation is not evident. Participation does not encourage further discussion and dialogue with other students in the class. Participation is critical, argumentative, or confrontational. Individual group contributions are submitted extremely late, affecting the group’s ability to accomplish a successful task. Cooperative teamwork is not evident. Participation encourages discussion and dialogue with other students in the class. Participation is professional and exhibits a positive attitude that is respectful of others. Individual contributions are submitted but not on time. Cooperative teamwork is exhibited but limited. Participation encourages further discussion and dialogue with other students in the class. Participation is professional and exhibits a positive attitude that is respectful of others. Individual contributions are provided by the designated timeline. Cooperative teamwork is exhibited but not consistently. All participation encourages further discussion and extensive dialogue with other students in the class. Participation demonstrates a critical analysis of classmates’ participation and provides relevant and constructive feedback. Individual contributions are provided before the designated timeline. Cooperative teamwork is exhibited in order to complete the project.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text Complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
100 %Total Weightage

Question Part 2: Policy Brief

Max Points: 75

Details: Select a public health issue and write a 750-1,000 word policy brief that provides a brief summary of the issue, options to solve the issue, and the best way to solve this issue. Select a public health issue from one of the following American Public Health Association websites: Climate Change (https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/climate-change) or Topics and Issues (https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues).

Follow this outline when writing the policy brief:

1. Identify issue.

2. Background information – (a) Population effected; (b) Local, state or national level; and (c) Evidence about the issues supported by resources

3. Problem statement.

4. Suggestions for addressing the issue (solutions) – (a) Including necessary stakeholders (government officials, administrator); and (b) Include budget or funding considerations, if applicable

5. Impact on the Health Care Delivery System

Include three peer-reviewed sources and two other sources to support the policy brief.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric given below prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Rubric

Policy Brief

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Background Information A discussion of background information is not included. A discussion of background information is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. A discussion of background information is present. Some subject knowledge is evident. A discussion of background information is present, and subject knowledge is competent. A discussion of background information is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
20.0 %Problem Statement A problem statement is not included. A problem statement is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. A problem statement is present. Some subject knowledge is evident. A problem statement is included, and subject knowledge is competent. A problem statement is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
20.0 %Suggestions Suggestions for addressing the issue are not included. Suggestions for addressing the issue are present but lack detail or are incomplete. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Suggestions for addressing the issue are present. Some subject knowledge is evident. Suggestions for addressing the issue is present, and subject knowledge is competent. Suggestions for addressing the issue are thoroughly developed with supporting details.
20.0 %Impact A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is not included. A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is present. Some subject knowledge is evident. A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is present, and subject knowledge is competent. A discussion on the impact on the health care delivery system is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
3.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Permalink:  ‎

Community Assessment And Analysis Presentation

My community is Bakersfield, California I was thinking of interviewing in regards to lack of mental health facilities and planning locally.

This is a Collaborative Learning Community assignment.

This assignment consists of both an interview and a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation.

Assessment/Interview

Select a community of interest. It is important that the community selected be one in which a CLC group member currently resides. Students residing in the chosen community should be assigned to perform the physical assessment of the community.

  1. Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.”
  2. Interview a community health and public health provider regarding that person’s role and experiences within the community.

Interview Guidelines

Interviews can take place in-person, by phone, or by Skype. Complete the “Provider Interview Acknowledgement Form” and submit with the group presentation.

Develop one set of interview questions to gather information about the role of the provider in the community and the health issues faced by the chosen community.

Compile key findings from the interview, including the interview questions used, and submit with the group presentation

Community assessment is the process of identifying the strengths, assets, needs and challenges of a specified community. … A community assessment is usually performed early in the development of a coalition to better understand the communityand decide how the coalition might best address its concerns (Butterfoss, 2007).

Methods of needs assessment can be classified into seven main types, each of which can take many different forms in practice.
  • Gap or discrepancy analysis. …
  • Reflection on action and reflection in action. …
  • Self assessment by diaries, journals, log books, weekly reviews. …
  • Peer review. …
  • Observation.
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-O503 Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation 150.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (75.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (89.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 90.0%
Description of Community and Community Boundaries: (People, Geographic, Geopolitical, Financial, Educational Level, Ethnic, Phenomenological Features and Types of Interactions, Goals, Interests, Barriers, and Challenges, Including Social Determinates of Health) 20.0% Description of boundaries of community is omitted. Description of community and boundaries is unclear or incomplete and missing one or more necessary components to give context to the community assessment. Description of community and boundaries of community is complete. A brief description of all components is offered. Description of community and boundaries of community is complete, and components of community functioning are discussed in sufficient depth. Description of community is complete. Boundaries are described in great detail, distinguishing environmental boundaries, environmental relationships, and external systems that comprise the open, community system.
Summary of Community Health Assessment 20.0% Community assessment is omitted. Community assessment is provided but discussion is vague or incomplete. Community assessment is complete, and a synopsis of each functional health pattern (FHP) is included. Nursing process and functional health patterns (FHP) are identified with clear indications for actual, at-risk, and potential for improved health. Discussion of functional health patterns is clear, complete, and comprehensive, with indications for actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses as well as recommendations for surveillance and preventive measures.
Identification of Issue That Is Lacking or an Opportunity for Health Promotion 20.0% Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is omitted. Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is included but discussion is vague or incomplete NA NA Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is effectively included.
Conclusion With  Summary of Findings and Impressions of General Community Health 15.0% Conclusion is omitted. Conclusion is incomplete or unclear. Conclusion is complete, with general summary of findings. Conclusion is clear, with a comprehensive discussion of findings and general health of the community. Conclusion is comprehensive, with a detailed summary of key findings that explains general health of the community and offers rationale for recommendations.
Summary of Interview With Community Health/Public Health Provider 15.0% Summary table is omitted. Summary table is incomplete or unclear. Summary table includes all functional health patterns with adequate documentation. Summary table is clear, with a detailed and comprehensive description of findings from an assessment of the chosen community. Summary table is comprehensive, with a detailed description of findings, as well as actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses and recommendations for surveillance and preventative measures.
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 10.0%
Layout 5.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation – Rubric

Description of Community and Community Boundaries

Criteria Description

Description of Community and Community Boundaries: (People, Geographic, Geopolitical, Financial, Educational Level, Ethnic, Phenomenological Features and Types of Interactions, Goals, Interests, Barriers, and Challenges, Including Social Determinates of Health)

5. Excellent

25 points

Description of community is complete. Boundaries are described in great detail, distinguishing environmental boundaries, environmental relationships, and external systems that comprise the open, community system.

4. Good

22.25 points

Description of community and boundaries of community is complete, and components of community functioning are discussed in sufficient depth.

3. Satisfactory

19.75 points

Description of community and boundaries of community is complete. A brief description of all components is offered.

2. Less than Satisfactory

18.75 points

Description of community and boundaries is unclear or incomplete and missing one or more necessary components to give context to the community assessment.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Description of boundaries of community is omitted.

Summary of Community Health Assessment

Criteria Description

Summary of Community Health Assessment

5. Excellent

25 points

Discussion of functional health patterns is clear, complete, and comprehensive, with indications for actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses as well as recommendations for surveillance and preventive measures.

4. Good

22.25 points

Nursing process and functional health patterns (FHP) are identified with clear indications for actual, at-risk, and potential for improved health.

3. Satisfactory

19.75 points

Community assessment is complete, and a synopsis of each functional health pattern (FHP) is included.

2. Less than Satisfactory

18.75 points

Community assessment is provided but discussion is vague or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Community assessment is omitted.

Identification of Issue That Is Lacking or an Opportunity for Health Promotion

Criteria Description

Identification of Issue That Is Lacking or an Opportunity for Health Promotion

5. Excellent

25 points

Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is effectively included.

4. Good

22.25 points

NA

3. Satisfactory

19.75 points

NA

2. Less than Satisfactory

18.75 points

Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is included but discussion is vague or incomplete

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion is omitted.

Conclusion With Summary of Findings and Impressions of General Community Health

Criteria Description

Conclusion With Summary of Findings and Impressions of General Community Health

5. Excellent

18.75 points

Conclusion is comprehensive, with a detailed summary of key findings that explains general health of the community and offers rationale for recommendations.

4. Good

16.69 points

Conclusion is clear, with a comprehensive discussion of findings and general health of the community.

3. Satisfactory

14.81 points

Conclusion is complete, with general summary of findings.

2. Less than Satisfactory

14.06 points

Conclusion is incomplete or unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Conclusion is omitted.

Summary of Interview With Community Health/Public Health Provider

Criteria Description

Summary of Interview With Community Health/Public Health Provider

5. Excellent

18.75 points

Summary table is comprehensive, with a detailed description of findings, as well as actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses and recommendations for surveillance and preventative measures.

4. Good

16.69 points

Summary table is clear, with a detailed and comprehensive description of findings from an assessment of the chosen community.

3. Satisfactory

14.81 points

Summary table includes all functional health patterns with adequate documentation.

2. Less than Satisfactory

14.06 points

Summary table is incomplete or unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Summary table is omitted.

Layout

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

6.25 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

5.56 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory

4.94 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.69 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Excellent

6.25 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Good

5.56 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory

4.94 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.69 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Total 125 points
Did you find apk for android? You can find new and apps.

Instant Nursing Papers
Hire a Nursing Expert
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose Instant Nursing Papers?

Quality Nursing Papers

We assist students in achieving the best top-grade in their nursing papers, and in compliance with the provided instructions. Have your nursing paper written with a certified specialist Ph.D., Bachelor's, and Master's graduates with many years of experience in academic writing.

Experts with Ph.d., MDs and DNP Holders

Our writers have acquired Ph.D., MDs and DNP credentials from world class institutions. Our writers can handle papers from any discipline and can handle over 100+ subjects.

Nursing Papers Cheap

We provide a great deal of student-friendly prices and professionalism with all our nursing essay writing services. Our paper writing services have a user-friendly interface and professional nursing academic assistance. We are committed to assisting all students with their nursing assignments and projects regardless of their academic level.

Fast Paper Delivery

Our writers follow a strict schedule to ensure papers are delivered before the deadline to enable our editors to proofread before the final delivery to our customers. We strictly observe the early delivery of assignments to meet our clients' deadlines.

Plagiarism-free Nursing Papers

Our expert nursing paper writers are dedicated to conducting thorough research and writing papers from scratch to deliver original papers. To avoid paper plagiarism, all orders go through steps of writing, editing, and proofreading.

24Hour Customer Help

Our customer support is available 24/7/365 to help clients and make their paper writing services easy to use. Our experienced support team is available to answer your queries any time, 24 hours a day.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Nursing Papers Writing Service

We provide Nursing Assignment Services to Nursing students. Also, we are not limited to providing Nursing assignment help to students only. We also provide assignment help and solutions to community health nursing, Anatomy & Physiology, Microbiology, Biochemistry and Biophysics, and Nutrition & Dietetics.

Essays

Nursing Essays

Sit back, relax while our writers sort you out on your most daunting nursing essay queries on how to write a good nursing essay. We got you if you are looking for the best nursing essay services.

Research

Nursing Projects

It is no doubt that qualifying for a nursing career is difficult and requires a series of tests. Most nursing students must put in a lot of work in their assignments and coursework. Instantnursingpapers.com will help you answer queries such as “who can write my nursing research paper?”.

Disserations

Nursing Dissertation Help

Instantnursingpapers.com will save you the hustle of undergoing pressure or even depression while doing your nursing dissertation paper. Save yourself from all the long sleepless nights and pressure by working with our best nursing dissertation writing professionals.

Coursework

Nursing Coursework Help

If you happen to hop into our site in search of nursing coursework help, look no further. We are the number one solution for the best nursing coursework assignments. Therefore, to complete the best APA nursing coursework, seek help from professional nursing coursework experts at instantnursingpapers.com