Herzing University NU627 Performance Summary and Study Plan Paper

The following information should be included in this 1-2 page paper:

The plan should reflect your experience with the predictor. Compare your results of the pre-predictor with the post-predictor.

Detail your plan for certification including which test you will take and when you plan to take it. Include information on your current certification preparation resources.

Please use APA format which includes a cover page and reference page. Include a minimum of one source citation.

Directions: Create an APA formatted paper For the Prettest Evaluation plan, please detail the following in an essay format and include all of the following:

Explain the experience of taking the assessment test; how long did it take, did you have enough time, what were the questions like.
What did you learn from the experience of taking the assessment?
Evaluation of lowest areas: which were the lowest areas on your assessment. Identify the areas below the 70% score. These are the areas that are priority study areas for you.
Next, look at the domains of the test, which is your lowest, why do you think you scored as you did? What do you need to do to raise your scores?
Evaluation of the highest areas: which were the highest areas on your assessment. Identify the areas above the 70% score. These are the areas that you are strongest in. Next, look at the domains of the test, which is your highest, why do you think you scored as you did?
Develop a plan of study, using course materials.for example Maria Leik FNP certification

Use this rubric as a guide

NU 627 Unit 6 APEA Evaluation and Study Plan Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Concepts

10.0 pts

Ideas and concepts are consistently clear and always well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are always discussed fairly and always synthesized in a logical fashion with strong, well-founded supporting arguments. All discussion and arguments are thoroughly supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable.Herzing University NU627 Performance Summary and Study Plan Paper

9.0 pts

Ideas and concepts are clear and well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are discussed fairly and synthesized in a logical fashion with well-founded supporting arguments. Discussion and arguments are supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable

8.0 pts

Ideas and concepts are reasonably well explained. Discussion and arguments are, for the most part, supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable relationships between concepts, and ideas are discussed. These could be further strengthened with additional research or resource materials.

7.0 pts

Basic ideas and concepts are presented; however, they are under-developed and poorly explained. There is minimal evidence of a relationship between ideas and concepts. Discussion and arguments are not supported with additional research or research that is pertinent and valid.

6.0 pts

Some basic ideas and concepts are started, but not developed. There is no identifiable relationship between ideas and concepts. There is little or no discussion and/or argument with supporting research.

0.0 pts

There are no developed ideas or concepts. There is no supporting research.

10.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

5.0 pts

Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

4.5 pts

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

4.0 pts

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

3.5 pts

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.Herzing University NU627 Performance Summary and Study Plan Paper

3.0 pts

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

5.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Conventions

5.0 pts

The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

The paper exhibits a strong command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

The paper exhibits command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.Herzing University NU627 Performance Summary and Study Plan Paper

4.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0pts

Evaluate Your Summary SAMPLE

Assessment is a crucial part of nursing education and certification. Before the pretest evaluation, my view about the evaluation was narrow, finding it as a stressful event for giving students a grade and an approach to know whether one has gained the content presented in learning, measured through tests. The pretest questions were presented in a manner that required keen contemplation, for example, the consideration of all underlying conditions before the subscription of a formulation. This gave the feeling that the duration provided for the test was insufficient, with the assessment taking about an hour. The experience of taking the assessment gave me an important lesson. I learned that the assessment was not only a strategy to check if a learner has gained class content but is also a tool set to help learners acquire more knowledge and skills (Care, Kim, Vista, & Anderson, 2018). I also found assessment as a powerful lifelong learning tool that can improve my learning process, thereby improving professional development (Qalehsari, Khaghanizadeh, & Ebadi, 2017). Through the assessment, I was able to identify and reflect my areas of strengths and weaknesses, therefore getting the opportunity to concentrate and improve on the weaknesses.Herzing University NU627 Performance Summary and Study Plan Paper

Using the prediction of student passing summary, a score of 64 percent or below is considered as “unlikely success for certification” and the areas of knowledge that fall in this category include cardiovascular, dermatology, endocrine, ENT, hematology, men’s health, pediatrics, professional issues, sexually transmitted infections, urology, and women’s health. The lowest domains of the test are urology, hematology, women’s health, professional issues, and cardiovascular. My contemplation about these scores lays in the method of preparation, which is memorizing. I have found memorizing information to know what to do and know why I am doing it a poor approach for assessment preparation because the twisting of questions can make answering challenging. Instead, understanding concepts and applying knowledge so that I know what to do and why I am doing would be an exceptional approach to prepare for assessment and practice. The highest areas of knowledge (scored above 70 percent) include gastroenterology, neurology, orthopedics, and pregnancy. Pregnancy is the highest area of knowledge, followed by orthopedics. These are the areas where I find my knowledge base secure, and my thought about this scoring is because of the constant placement in these areas over the years.

Plan of Study

Learning Goals	Activities	Timeline	Reflection Of How Accomplishing the Goal With Improve My Certification
Improve knowledge of urology and urological conditions	1. Complete urologic subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 80%. 2. Scrutinize urology in clinical guidelines of course material. 3. Review urological articles and webinars 4. Study urology for 3 hours every week	Each learning activity will be achieved by week four ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed	The learning goals and the set timeline will help improve the capacity to answer the quizzes and advance my comprehension of urological disorders, their diagnosis, and management.Herzing University NU627 Performance Summary and Study Plan Paper
Improve knowledge of women’s health	1. Complete women’s health subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 85%. 2. Analyze all women’s health concerns and conditions in the course material. 3. Ask my preceptor to guide me through clinical women’s health issues (Phuma-Ngaiyaye, Bvumbwe, & Chipeta, 2017). 4. Study women health’s for 3 hours every week	Each learning activity will be achieved by the third week ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed	The learning goals and their timeline will improve my comprehension of women’s health issues and concerns, diagnosis, and management.
Improve knowledge of sexually transmitted infections	1. Complete gynecological subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 90%. 2. Scrutinize STIs in clinical guidelines of course material. 3. Review STIs articles and webinars 4. Study STIs for 3 hours every week	Each learning activity will be achieved by the fourth week ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed thereafter	The learning goals and their timeline will improve my comprehension of STIs, their symptoms, risks, complications, and diagnosis, and management.Herzing University NU627 Performance Summary and Study Plan Paper
Improve knowledge of pediatrics and pediatric conditions	1. Complete pediatrics subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 90%. 2. Analyze all pediatric concerns and conditions in the course material. 3. Ask my preceptor to guide me through pediatric issues, assessments, and care 4. Study pediatrics health for 3 hours every week	Each learning activity will be achieved by the fourth week ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed thereafter	The learning goals and the set timeline will help improve the capacity to answer the quizzes and advance my comprehension of pediatric disorders, assessments, diagnosis, and clinical management.
Improve knowledge of men’s health	1. Complete men’s health subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 90%. 2. Analyze all men’s health concerns and conditions in the course material. 3. Read at least five journals related to men’s health 4. Ask my preceptor to guide me through men’s health issues, assessments, and care 5. Study men’s health for 4 hours every week	Each learning activity will be achieved by the fourth week ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed thereafter	The learning goals and the set timeline will help improve the capacity to answer the quizzes and advance my comprehension of men’s health, assessments, diagnosis, and clinical management.Herzing University NU627 Performance Summary and Study Plan Paper
Improve knowledge of hematology and hematological disorders	1. Complete hematology subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 90%. 2. Analyze all hematological disorders in the course material. 3. Read at least three journals related to hematology 4. Study hematology for 3 hours every week	Each learning activity will be achieved by the fourth week ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed thereafter	The learning goals and the set timeline will help improve the capacity to answer the quizzes and advance my comprehension of hematological disorders, diagnosis, and clinical management.
Improve knowledge on the conditions of eye, ear, nose, and throat (ENT)	1. Complete ENT subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 90%. 2. Analyze all ENT disorders and concerns in the course material. 3. Read at least four journals related to ENT 4. Ask my preceptor to guide me through ENT subjects 5. Study ENT for 4 hours every week	Each learning activity will be achieved by the fourth week ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed thereafter	The learning goals and the set timeline will help improve the capacity to answer the quizzes and advance my comprehension of ENT disorders, assessments, diagnosis, and clinical management.
Improve knowledge of endocrine and endocrinology	1. Complete endocrinology subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 90%. 2. Analyze all endocrine conditions in the course material. 3. Read at least three journals related to endocrinology 4. Ask my preceptor to guide me through endocrinological issues 5. Study endocrine disorders for 3 hours every week. Herzing University NU627 Performance Summary and Study Plan Paper	Each learning activity will be achieved by the fourth week ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed thereafter	The learning goals and the set timeline will help improve the capacity to answer the quizzes and advance my comprehension of endocrine disorders, assessments, diagnosis, and clinical management.
Improve knowledge of dermatological conditions	1. Complete dermatological subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 90%. 2. Analyze all dermatological conditions in the course material. 3. Read at least five journals dermatology 4. Ask my preceptor to guide me through dermatological disorders and assessments 5. Study dermatology for 4 hours every week	Each learning activity will be achieved by the fourth week ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed thereafter	The learning goals and the set timeline will help improve the capacity to answer the quizzes and advance my comprehension of dermatological disorders, assessments, diagnosis, and clinical management.
Improve knowledge of cardiovascular conditions	1. Complete cardiovascular health subject assessments in “APEA my Q bank” until I can get a higher score of at least 90%. 2. Analyze all cardiovascular conditions in the course material. 3. Read at least five journals related to cardiovascular conditions, assessment, and management 4. Ask my preceptor to guide me through cardiovascular health issues, assessments, diagnosis, and management 5. Study cardiovascular health for 4 hours every week	Each learning activity will be achieved by the fourth week ahead of predictor assessment and reviewed thereafter	The learning goals and the set timeline will help improve the capacity to answer the quizzes and advance my comprehension of cardiovascular disorders, assessments, diagnosis, and clinical management.