Maladaptive Behavior Case Study assignment
Maladaptive Behavior Case Study
Introduction
Maladaptive behavior alludes to sorts of conducts that repress an individual’s capability to conform to specific scenarios. Some of the time, individuals who don’t feel positive about facing the challenges that come their direction in life develops maladaptive conduct to lessen their anxiety (Rojahn et al. 2012). Unfortunately, this essentially never works out well. Staying away from scenarios on account of unreasonable reasons of fear might at first decrease anxiety, yet this shirking is simply that: it doesn’t tackle the true issues. Inevitably, issues can come to be big to the point that the agony of escaping them is overwhelming. They can never again be disregarded. A normal type of maladaptive conduct is turning to liquor or sedates for shelter in place of attempting to address a challenge. Before all else, these substances make the impression for their abusers that they are breaking away their issues, however this is just a transitory relief. They are truly aggravating things much, and they risk falling into fixation. Some of these individuals might have an undiagnosed mental health condition, for example despondency, and this is alluded to as self-medication. Whatever the underlying reason, as time passes the harm brought on by the substance ill-use exceeds any profits that individuals showing this maladaptive conduct may be getting. These individuals frequently don’t distinguish this. Unfortunately, when they escape their refusal they will recently be dependent on these substances (Willem et al. 2012).
Discussion
The case study we conducted was on a boy who lives in US; he is the only child of his parents and is suffering from maladaptive behavior. His name is James and he is 26 years old (Zufferey et al. 2013). When this case study was being conducted we decided to visit his place, the area was not so good and their house was not in a very good condition. We came to this judgment that James family was poor. When we visited his place we had a long conversation with James parents, James however did not agreed to meet us. James parents told us that he was really angry about our visit and was not willing to meet us. After some days when we visited again James finally agreed to meet us, During this meeting we came to know that James didn’t speak much, not just because we were there, it was is usual behavior. During our discussion we noticed James biting his nails, shaking his legs, showing that he was uneasy. Overall, James was a polite boy and respected people. We got to know that he had no social life, from some years and very less activities. We also noticed that James was a bit aggressive possibly because of his problem; he reacted very quickly to things and started doing stuff that was not something that a normal person will do (Elizabeth, 2010).
You learned about some of the person, environment, and time dimensions (i.e., biological, psychological, spiritual, and physical environment). In this assignment, you will generate a case study of an individual, highlighting his or her maladaptive behaviors, and then create a report demonstrating how you would work toward improving this individual’s healthy functioning.
Tasks:
In a 5- to 6-page paper, describe an individual who demonstrates maladaptive behavior. In your case study:
- Describe in detail the individual and his or her behavior.
- Explain how this individual demonstrates maladaptive behavior. Include behavioral characteristics, problems, and symptoms.
- Discuss factors that contributed to the development of maladaptive behavior in the individual.
- Identify and apply appropriate theories of maladaptive behavior to this individual.
- Propose strategies and services for improving healthy functioning in this individual. Remember to include the specific patterns of change in the individual and in his or her environment needed to promote healthy functioning.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. Assault In The City: Trial, Sentencing And Appeal
Submission Details:
- By Wednesday, October 7, 2015, prepare a 5- to 6-page paper. Your response should rely upon at least two sources from professional literature. This may include the Argosy University online library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, .org, or .gov). Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA format); and use accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
- Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
- Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
- One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
- I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
- Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
- In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
- Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
- Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
- Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
- Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
- I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
- I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
- As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
- It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
- For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
- Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
- Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
- Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
- The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
- Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
- If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
- I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
- As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
- Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
- Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
- Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.